Legal Opinion
Armstrong v. Armstrong
Ohio Supreme Court
Decided December 28, 1927No. 20532PublishedCited by 33 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtMatthias, J.
The question here presented arises under the provisions of the Federal Constitution, Article IY, Section 1, requiring that “Full Faith and Credit shall be given in each State to the public acts, records, and judicial Proceedings of every other State,” the specific question being whether an order for alimony to be paid in future installments, entered by a Kentucky court, is within the protection of the full faith and credit clause of the United States Constitution and may be enforced in this state.
It is contended that the right to demand and receive alimony ordered to be paid in installments…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Barber v. Barber Ex Rel. CronkhiteSupreme Court of the United States · 1859
- Sistare v. SistareSupreme Court of the United States · 1910
- Lynde v. LyndeSupreme Court of the United States · 1901
- Lynde v. Lynde; Lynde v. LyndeSupreme Court of the United States · 1900
- Livingston v. . LivingstonNew York Court of Appeals · 1903
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by33 opinions
- Biewend v. BiewendCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
- McPherson v. McPhersonOhio Supreme Court · 1950
- Creager v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1932
- Stephenson v. Duriron CompanyDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 1968
- Smith v. SmithOhio Court of Appeals · 1957
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.