Legal Opinion

Webster v. Stevenson

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided April 10, 1909No. 15,963Published

Error from Ness district court; Charles E. Lob-dell, judge.

1Per curiam

• The tax deed under which plaintiff claimed title is void on its face because it fails to state the amount for which the land was bid off by the county, and the omission is not cured by any of the other recitals. (Robidoux v. Munson, 75 Kan. 207.) The amount for which the certificate was assigned is stated, but at the date of the assignment the taxes were due for two subsequent years, and it is impossible to ascertain from the face of the deed how much of the amount paid was for the taxes for the year for which the land was sold and how much was for the subsequent taxes. (Gibson v. Ast, 77…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Robidoux v. MunsonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1907
  2. Gibson v. AstSupreme Court of Kansas · 1908

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API