National Labor Relatons Board v. Tobacco Processors, Incorporated
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
1Per curiam
We decline to enforce the Board’s order requiring the company to bargain with the union because we conclude that the union was improperly certified. At the election the Board excluded four ballots which were blank on their face but which had the word “no” written on their back. The ballots should have been counted since they clearly manifested the voters’ intention not to be represented by the union. NLRB v. Titche-Goettinger Co., 433 F.2d 1046 (5 Cir. 1970). When those ballots are counted the union lost the election.
Enforcement denied.
2Cited by15 opinions
- National Labor Relations Board v. Sauk Valley Manufacturing Co., Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1973
- National Labor Relations Board v. The Duriron Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1992
- National Labor Relations Board v. Connecticut Foundry Company, International Ladies' Garment Workers Union, Afl-Cio, IntervenorCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1982
- National Labor Relations Board v. Wrape Forest Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1979
- National Labor Relations Board v. Consolidated Liberty, Inc., D/B/A Hy-Lond Convalescent HospitalCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1982
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.