Legal Opinion
Reeves v. Andrus
District Court, D. Alaska
Decided February 14, 1979No. A-158-73 CivilPublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
VON DER HEYDT, Chief Judge.
THIS CAUSE comes before the court on plaintiff’s motion for partial summary judgment. Oral argument on this motion is denied in order to expedite the business of the court. Local Rule 5(C)(1).
The plaintiff in this case has been attempting since July 2, 1965 to perfect a claim under the homestead laws as they then applied to Alaska. 1 The facts are contained in a stipulation prepared for Administrative Law Judge Ratzman and appear in a decision issued by him on April 16, 1976, in In the Matter of Reeves, No. AO 62807.
“On July 2, 1965, Mr. Reeves…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- United States v. Midwest Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1915
- MINOR v. the Mechanics Bank of AlexandriaSupreme Court of the United States · 1828
- United States Ex Rel. Chapman v. Federal Power CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
- Chemehuevi Tribe of Indians v. Federal Power CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- United States Ex Rel. Siegel v. ThomanSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Lee v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
- Lee v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Alaska · 1985
- Lee v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987