Legal Opinion

Oklahoma Co. v. State Industrial Com.

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided April 21, 1931No. 21525PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAndrews, J.

This is an original proceeding in this court to review an award made in favor of the claimant before the State Industrial Commission, respondent hen in. The award was for temporary total diss bility, permanent p'artial disability of the left arm, and disfigurement to the nose. It is here contended that there was no evident ■> to support the award for temporary total disability or for disfigurement.

The claimant testified that he was unable to work and Dr. Breco testified that he was not able to do manual labor at all. Under that state of the record, the award in favor of the claimant for…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Transcontinental Oil Co. v. EoffSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1927

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Kwikset/Emhart v. MayberrySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1990
  2. Skelly Oil Co. v. SkinnerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1933
  3. Muncrief v. Memorial Hospital of Southern OklahomaSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1988
  4. Black, Sivalls & Bryson, Inc. v. HomierSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1944
  5. Kahl & Smiley Drilling Co. v. GarrardSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1931

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API