Legal Opinion

Heath v. State

Supreme Court of Delaware

Decided November 4, 2009No. 550, 2008PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

STEELE, Chief Justice:

The Governor, as the Board of Pardons recommended, unconditionally pardoned Brian Heath for Second Degree Unlawful Sexual Contact. We address, on first impression, whether that pardon permits Heath to deregister as a sexual offender. The trial judge decided that the pardon statute’s silence regarding registration differentiates its effect from expunction, which would extinguish Heath’s Registry requirements. Because the Board and Governor review “propensity for recidivism” before recommending and granting an unconditional pardon and a pardon restores all civil rights, no…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Schick v. ReedSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  2. United States v. Gregory Paul NoonanCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1990
  3. State v. SkinnerSupreme Court of Delaware · 1993
  4. Helman v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 2001
  5. State Ex Rel. Wier v. PetersonSupreme Court of Delaware · 1976

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. State v. CulpSupreme Court of Delaware · 2016
  2. Fatir v. Governor of the State of DelawareSuperior Court of Delaware · 2019
  3. Gattis v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 2025
  4. InterMune, Inc. and Roche Holdings, Inc. v. W. Scott Harkonen, M.D.Court of Chancery of Delaware · 2023
  5. Lowicki v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 2020

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API