Legal Opinion

Harrison v. McMahon

New York Surrogate's Court

Decided September 15, 1850PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The Surrogate.

The applicant is one of the sons and legatees of the testatrix. Mr. McMahon and wife, in her right as a daughter and legatee, object to the grant of letters, on the ground that the applicant is incompetent to execute the duties of the trust by reason of improvidence. (2 li. /S’., 3d ed., p. 139, § 33.) The section of the statute *284under which this objection is made, reads as follows : “ Mo letters of administration shall be granted to a person convicted of an infamous crime, nor to any one incapable by law of making a contract, nor to a person not a citizen of the United States,…

2Cited by4 opinions

  1. Russell v. Pacific Railway Co.California Supreme Court · 1896
  2. In re Estate of PachecoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1863
  3. In Re the Administration of the Estate of GoddardNew York Court of Appeals · 1884
  4. Plummer v. RussellCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1810

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API