Harrison v. McMahon
New York Surrogate's Court
1Opinion of the Court
The Surrogate.
The applicant is one of the sons and legatees of the testatrix. Mr. McMahon and wife, in her right as a daughter and legatee, object to the grant of letters, on the ground that the applicant is incompetent to execute the duties of the trust by reason of improvidence. (2 li. /S’., 3d ed., p. 139, § 33.) The section of the statute *284under which this objection is made, reads as follows : “ Mo letters of administration shall be granted to a person convicted of an infamous crime, nor to any one incapable by law of making a contract, nor to a person not a citizen of the United States,…
2Cited by4 opinions
- Russell v. Pacific Railway Co.California Supreme Court · 1896
- In re Estate of PachecoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1863
- In Re the Administration of the Estate of GoddardNew York Court of Appeals · 1884
- Plummer v. RussellCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1810