Legal Opinion

Judd Supply Co. v. Merchants & Manufacturers Insurance Co.

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided December 12, 1989No. C5-89-507PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

NORTON, Judge.

The City of Princeton appeals a judgment awarding damages to former mechanics’ lienholders who foreclosed against a privately-owned parcel developed in part through tax increment financing. We reverse.

FACTS

This appeal arises after a tax increment financing-motivated construction project, begun within the City of Princeton in 1983, went awry. Appellant City of Princeton (“City”) had published a tax increment finance plan and designated a Development District (“District”) in accordance with Minn.Stat. ch. 472A (now replaced by Minn. Stat. ch. 469). Respondents either…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. A. J. Chromy Construction Co. v. Commercial Mechanical Services, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
  2. Burlington Manufacturing Co. v. Board of Courthouse & City Hall CommissionersSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1897

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Achen-Gardner, Inc. v. Superior CourtArizona Supreme Court · 1992
  2. Chenoweth v. City of New BrightonCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2003
  3. Green Electric System, Inc. v. Metropolitan Airports CommissionCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1992
  4. L. Suzio Concrete Co. v. New Haven Tobacco, Inc.Connecticut Appellate Court · 1992
  5. Achen-Gardner, Inc. v. Superior CourtArizona Supreme Court · 1992

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API