Judd Supply Co. v. Merchants & Manufacturers Insurance Co.
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
NORTON, Judge.
The City of Princeton appeals a judgment awarding damages to former mechanics’ lienholders who foreclosed against a privately-owned parcel developed in part through tax increment financing. We reverse.
FACTS
This appeal arises after a tax increment financing-motivated construction project, begun within the City of Princeton in 1983, went awry. Appellant City of Princeton (“City”) had published a tax increment finance plan and designated a Development District (“District”) in accordance with Minn.Stat. ch. 472A (now replaced by Minn. Stat. ch. 469). Respondents either…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- A. J. Chromy Construction Co. v. Commercial Mechanical Services, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
- Burlington Manufacturing Co. v. Board of Courthouse & City Hall CommissionersSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1897
3Cited by7 opinions
- Achen-Gardner, Inc. v. Superior CourtArizona Supreme Court · 1992
- Chenoweth v. City of New BrightonCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2003
- Green Electric System, Inc. v. Metropolitan Airports CommissionCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1992
- L. Suzio Concrete Co. v. New Haven Tobacco, Inc.Connecticut Appellate Court · 1992
- Achen-Gardner, Inc. v. Superior CourtArizona Supreme Court · 1992
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.