Legal Opinion · Dissent

DeBlasio v. Zoning Board of Adjustment

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided May 1, 1995No. 93-5301Unknown

1DissentMeKELVIE, District Judge

(sitting by designation), dissenting.

I agree with the majority that this court should affirm the district court’s grant of summary judgment in favor of the defendants with respect to DeBlasio’s 42 U.S.C. § 1983 procedural due process claim, unlawful taking claim, § 1985(3) claim, commerce clause claim, and state tort claims against the Lavans. I further agree that we should reverse the grant of summary judgment in favor of the ZBA defendants with respect to the New Jersey tort claims. However, because I believe this court should affirm the grant of summary judgment as to DeBlasio’s…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Board of Regents of State Colleges v. RothSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  4. Village of Belle Terre v. BoraasSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  5. Coniston Corporation v. Village of Hoffman EstatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1988

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API