Legal Opinion

Tuten v. Zetterower

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided July 16, 1962No. 21727PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Candler, Justice.

On February 2, 1960, C. W. Zetterower, Janie Jones and Sue Z. Proctor filed an equitable action in the Superior Court of Chatham County against H. W. Tuten, Lila A. Tuten and Tuten Terrace, Inc., all residents of Florida. Their petition alleges: Petitioners became the holders and owners of a promissory note for $25,000 which H. W. Tuten and B. E. Tuten gave W. L. Zetterower, their father, on March 8, 1951, which provides for the payment of interest at the rate of 7% per annum from date. When such note was given, H. W. Tuten owned an undivided one-half interest in a certain…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Piggly-Wiggly Georgia Co. v. May Investing Corp.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1939
  2. High v. PadrosaSupreme Court of Georgia · 1904
  3. Harris v. PalmoreSupreme Court of Georgia · 1884
  4. Hale v. TurnerSupreme Court of Georgia · 1938
  5. Moulton v. BaerSupreme Court of Georgia · 1887

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Hoard v. WileyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1966
  2. Pruellage v. De Seaton CorporationMissouri Court of Appeals · 1966
  3. Barker v. WilkinsonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1966
  4. Halpern v. Margaret StreetNew York District Court · 1967
  5. Hoard v. WileyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1966

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API