Legal Opinion
Hickman v. United States
United States Court of Claims
Decided October 11, 1985No. 46-85CPublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
NETTESHEIM, Judge.
Plaintiff has moved pursuant to RUSCC 37(a)(2) for an order compelling production of documents, which defendant opposes.
FACTS
This case arises under the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938, 29 U.S.C. §§ 201-19 (1982) (the “FLSA”), and is brought by Joe S. Hickman (“plaintiff”), a federal employee to whom coverage of the FLSA was extended by the Act of April 8, 1974, Pub. L. No. 93-259, § 6(d)(1), 88 Stat. 55 (1974) (codified at 29 U.S.C. § 216(b) (1982)). Plaintiff seeks recovery of overtime compensation under section 216(b) of the FLSA, which assesses liquidated damages…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Oppenheimer Fund, Inc. v. SandersSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Claxton L. Burns, on Behalf of Himself and Others Similarly Situated v. Thiokol Chemical CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1973
- Roberta Braunstein v. Eastern Photographic Laboratories, Inc. And Heart of America Portraits, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1979
- Leonard R. Woods v. New York Life Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1982
- Beebe v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1981
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Hickman v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1986