Legal Opinion

Herzog v. Tidaback

New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division

Decided March 29, 1961PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

67 N.J. Super. 14 (1961)

169 A.2d 726

HARRY W. HERZOG AND MURIEL HERZOG, HIS WIFE, PLAINTIFFS,

v.

ANN R. TIDABACK (FORMERLY KNOWN AS ANN R. SCALERA) AND AUSTIN J. TIDABACK, HER HUSBAND, DEFENDANTS.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Chancery Division.

Decided March 29, 1961.

Mr. Michael A. Paticchio, attorney for plaintiff.

Messrs. Joseph J. and George G. Mutnick, attorneys for defendant (Mr. George G. Mutnick, appearing).

HERBERT, J.S.C.

The complaint seeks specific performance of an alleged contract by the defendants to sell a home in Plainfield, New Jersey to the plaintiffs. The defendants have moved for…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Judson v. Peoples Bank & Trust Co. of WestfieldSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1954
  2. Cousbelis v. AlexanderMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1944
  3. Harper v. . BattleSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1920
  4. Irvmor Corp. v. RodewaldNew York Court of Appeals · 1930
  5. Barton v. MolinMichigan Supreme Court · 1922

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Cohn v. FisherNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1972
  2. Metrobank v. National Com. BankNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1993
  3. Sutton v. LienauNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1988

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API