Cousbelis v. Alexander
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
1Opinion of the CourtWilkins, J.
The defendant declared in set-off for breach of a contract to buy real estate. The district court judge made a finding for the defendant. The Appellate Division vacated the finding and ordered judgment for the plaintiff. The defendant appealed.
Whether the defendant’s cause of action is properly one *730for set-off (see Ryder v. Warren, 295 Mass. 24) is not before us. No point of pleading was raised before the trial judge. See Botti v. Venice Grocery Co. 309 Mass. 450, 458.
The only question is the sufficiency of a memorandum under the statute of frauds (here G. L. [Ter. Ed.] c. 259, § 1, Fourth).…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Glass v. HulbertMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1869
- Hurley v. BrownMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1868
- Michelson v. ShermanMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1942
- Doherty v. HillMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1887
- Des Brisay v. FossMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1928
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by35 opinions
- Irving v. Goodimate Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1946
- Tzitzon Realty Co. Inc. v. MustonenMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1967
- Simon v. SimonMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1994
- A. B. C. Auto Parts, Inc. v. MoranMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1971
- Sands v. ArrudaMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1971
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.