Legal Opinion

Mastromonica v. Conklin

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided January 20, 1998PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., the defendant appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Lama, J.), dated December 19, 1996, which denied her motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The defendant’s motion papers failed to establish a prima facie case that the injuries sustained by the plaintiff Patricia Mastromonica were not serious (see, CPLR 3212 [b]; Mendola v Demetres, 212 AD2d 515). The report prepared by Ms. Mastromonica’s treating orthopedist indicated a decreased range of motion…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Mendola v. DemetresAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Peschanker v. LoportoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
  2. Tillman v. Metropolitan Suburban Bus AuthorityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001
  3. Silverstein v. DiFasanoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API