Legal Opinion
Holland Furnace Co. v. New Holland MacH. Co.
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Decided October 15, 1927No. 4007PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
KIRKPATRICK, District Judge.
The plaintiff is a Michigan corporation, having its principal office and its original manufacturing plant at Holland, Mich., at which place it has conducted the business of making warm-air furnaces since its incorporation in 1906. It now has two additional plants and more than 500 branch offices throughoiit the United States, from which iknot only sells direct to customers, but also installs and renders maintenance service. It is the largest manufacturer of warm-air furnaces in the United States. In the last seven years its total sales have grown from $4,500,-000…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Elgin National Watch Co. v. Illinois Watch Case Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1901
- Howe Scale Co. v. Wyckoff, Seamans & BenedictSupreme Court of the United States · 1905
- L. E. Waterman Co. v. Modern Pen Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1914
- Charles Broadway Rouss, Inc. v. Winchester Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1924
- Moline Plow Co. v. Omaha Iron Store Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1916
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Baltimore Bedding Corp. v. MosesCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1943
- Wallpaper Manufacturers, Ltd. v. Crown Wallcovering Corp.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1982
- Williamson-Dickie Manufacturing Company v. Davis Manufacturing Company, Solomon Davis, Joseph R. Davis and David DavisCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1958
- Robert Bruce, Inc. v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1972
- Hi-Land Dairyman's Ass'n v. Cloverleaf DairyUtah Supreme Court · 1944
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.