Legal Opinion

Neal v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided March 25, 2003No. 24871PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ROBERT S. BARNEY, Judge.

Neldon Neal (“Movant”) appeals from a judgment of the Circuit Court of Camden County denying his post-conviction motion brought pursuant to Rule 29.15 after a hearing.1 In his motion, Movant sought to vacate his conviction for robbery in the second degree, § 569.080, and his attendant sentence of 15 years imprisonment as a persistent offender. The conviction, a result of trial by jury, was affirmed by this Court on direct appeal in State v. Neal, 36 S.W.3d 814 (Mo.App.2001).

Movant raises four points of motion court error based on its findings and conclusion that…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Estelle v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  3. State v. ShurnSupreme Court of Missouri · 1993
  4. Leisure v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 1992
  5. State v. HallSupreme Court of Missouri · 1998

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Hendrix v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 2012
  2. David A. McNeal v. State of MissouriMissouri Court of Appeals · 2016
  3. Rothman v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 2011

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API