Legal Opinion

Edelmann v. National Patent Development Corp.

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided March 24, 1987No. 85 Civ. 7926 (MP)PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM GRANTING PARTIAL RELIEF UNDER RULE 56

MILTON POLLACK, Senior District Judge.

Defendants move for summary judgment on plaintiffs’ claims under Rule 56 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Plaintiffs allege breach of a licensing agreement, trademark infringement, unfair competition and fraud. For the reasons stated herein, the motion will be granted in part, and denied in part.

Plaintiffs Edelemann and Schultz are partners in Solarband Sports Associates, a New York partnership (“SSA”). On May 20, 1981 SSA and defendant MXL Industries, Inc., formerly National Hydron Incorporated…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Songbird Jet Ltd., Inc. v. Amax Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1984
  4. Marcella v. ARP Films, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1985
  5. Hotel Constructors, Inc. v. Seagrave Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1983

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Frutico, S.A. de C.V. v. Bankers Trust Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1993
  2. Alta Health Strategies, Inc. v. KennedyDistrict Court, D. Utah · 1992

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API