Tyman v. Hintz Concrete, Inc.
Arizona Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
HURWITZ, Justice.
¶ 1 This ease requires us to interpret Arizona Rule of Civil Procedure 15(c), which provides that in certain circumstances an amended complaint “relates back to the date of the original pleading” for statute of limitations purposes.
I
¶ 2 On June 4, 2002, Suzanne Tyman tripped and fell at a sidewalk construction site. She sustained personal injuries and retained counsel to pursue redress.
¶ 3 Tyman initially filed a notice of claim against the City of Surprise pursuant to A.R.S. § 12-821.01(A) (2001). Tyman learned, however, that the City was not responsible for the…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Schiavone v. FortuneSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Garrett v. FlemingCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2004
- Gregory Baskin v. City of Des Plaines, a Municipal Corporation, and Bruce Sotirakis, Individually and in His Official CapacityCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1998
- Walk v. RingArizona Supreme Court · 2002
- Leonard v. ParryCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2000
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Sundevil Power Holdings, LLC v. Arizona Department of RevenueCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2016
- Flynn v. CampbellCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2016
- Diane Flynn Et Vir v. Sarah CampbellArizona Supreme Court · 2017
- Nesbitt v. RadissonCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2014
- Sundevil Power Holdings, LLC v. Arizona Department of RevenueCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2016
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.