Legal Opinion

Lee v. State

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided June 22, 1944No. 6 Div. 223PublishedCited by 61 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LIVINGSTON, Justice.

The appellant, Virgil Lee, was indicted, tried and convicted under an indictment charging that he “did carnally know, or abuse in the attempt to carnally know Elese Lee, a girl under the age of twelve years,” etc. Title 14, section 398, Code of 1940.

A former conviction under the same indictment was reversed and the cause remanded by the Court of Appeals for errors pointed out by that court. Lee v. State, 31 Ala.App. 91, 13 So.2d 583, certiorari denied 244 Ala. 401, 13 So.2d 590.

Here, as on former appeal, the record contains no evidence that defendant was guilty of actual…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Johnson v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1941
  2. Campbell v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1853
  3. Levison v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1875
  4. Wilkins v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1940
  5. State ex rel. Illinois Cent. R. v. Board of Levee Com'rsSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1902

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by61 opinions

  1. Phelps v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1983
  2. Bowden v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1988
  3. Aaron v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1961
  4. State v. PaceOregon Supreme Court · 1949
  5. Noble v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1950

56 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API