Legal Opinion

Nu-Sash of Indianapolis, Inc. v. Carter

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided May 27, 2008No. 49S02-0801-CV-16PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BOEHM, Justice.

The Attorney General is authorized by statute, Ind.Code §§ 4-6-3-1 to -12 (2004), to seek a court order enforcing a civil investigative demand for information relevant to an investigation of potential violations of specified laws. In addition to meeting the requirements listed in sections 4 and 5 of the statute, the Attorney General must meet the requirement in section 6 that the Attorney General “demonstrate to the court that the demand is proper.” We hold that section 6 requires that the Attor ney General establish by evidence or other procedure authorized by the Indiana…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Indiana University Medical Center, Riley Hospital for Children v. LoganIndiana Supreme Court · 2000
  2. Porter Development, LLC v. First National Bank of ValparaisoIndiana Supreme Court · 2007
  3. Kronmiller v. WangbergIndiana Court of Appeals · 1996
  4. In Re the Guardianship of E.N.Indiana Supreme Court · 2007
  5. Auto-Owners Insurance v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1998

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. In Re Actiq Sales and Marketing Practices Litig.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2011
  2. Pinnacle Properties Development Group, LLC v. City of JeffersonvilleIndiana Supreme Court · 2008
  3. American Federation of State v. Cephalon, Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2011
  4. South Indiana Propane Gas, Inc. v. John Caffrey and Leola CaffreyIndiana Court of Appeals · 2016
  5. Todd Rokita, Indiana Attorney General v. Berry Global Group INC.Indiana Court of Appeals · 2026

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API