Murray v. Sumner
Indiana Court of Appeals
From Pike Circuit Court; John L. Brets, Judge. Action by Eva Sumner and others against John N. Murray and others. From a judgment for the plaintiffs, the defendants appeal.
1Opinion of the CourtEnloe, J.
— This was an action by appellees and against the appellants to set aside, as being fraudulent, a conveyance of certain real estate.
The complaint, which was in two paragraphs, was answered by appellant John N. Murray, first in general denial; second, denying any fraudulent intent and alleging that said conveyance was made upon a valuable consideration, and in fulfillment of certain promises theretofore made. The appellant Favillie *608Murray filed answer in four paragraphs, to the third of which a demurrer was sustained. The first paragraph of her answer was in general denial, and the second and…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Burt v. TimmonsWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1887
- Morgan v. KendrickSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1909
- Bank of Colfax v. RichardsonOregon Supreme Court · 1898
- Flint v. ChaloupkaNebraska Supreme Court · 1907
3Cited by3 opinions
- Smith v. PoppenSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1930
- Farmers Trust & Savings Bank v. DonnellyIndiana Court of Appeals · 1926
- Skinner v. J. I. Case Threshing MacHine Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1932