Legal Opinion

Smith v. Poppen

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided April 11, 1930No. File No. 6968PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCampbell, J.

On December 5, 1925, defendant M. H. Poppen executed a warranty deed conveying to the defendant Bertha M. Poppen, his wife, 399 acres of land in Deuel county, ■S. D., which deed was placed of record December 9, 1925.

On December 21, 1925, the indebtedness of M. H. Poppen to Estelline State Bank, represented by notes originating prior to the conveyance to his wife above mentioned, amounted with interest to $7,468.57, and on that date he executed and delivered to the Estelline State Bank his promissory note in that amount, covering thereby his indebtedness for past-due principal and interest…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Dolan v. NewberrySupreme Court of Iowa · 1925
  2. Peck v. PeckSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1927
  3. Thompson v. SchiekSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1927
  4. Buhl v. McDowellSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1927
  5. Churchill & Alden Co. v. RamseySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1922

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Neubauer v. CloutierSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1963
  2. Jahner v. JacobNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1977
  3. Bedell v. SteeleSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1947
  4. Eliot Discount Corp. v. DameMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1985
  5. Miller v. LangeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1940

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API