United States v. Viera
District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM
CALDWELL, District Judge.
I. Introduction.
The defendant, Jose Luis Viera, has filed a pro se motion under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 to vacate, set aside, or correct his sentence. Pursuant to a plea agreement, the defendant had pled guilty to a violation of 18 U.S.C. § 924(c)(1), which makes it unlawful to carry or use a firearm during and in relation to a drug trafficking offense. The motion argues that the conviction is invalid under the Supreme Court’s recent decision in Bailey v. United States, — U.S. -, 116 S.Ct. 501, 133 L.Ed.2d 472 (1995).
In opposition, the government contends that the…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Bailey v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- United States v. Thomas PriceCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1996
- United States v. Charlene Hoyle, United States of America v. Cheryl McCullough BentonCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1994
- United States v. Donald Bogusz, A/K/A Bogey, United States of America v. John O'rourke, A/K/A HapCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1994
- United States v. Paul LevineCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1981
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- United States v. Raymond M. MidgleyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1998
- United States v. BunnerCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1998
- United States v. Raphael Podde, Gabriel ReguerCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1997
- State v. BelmarezNebraska Supreme Court · 1998
- United States v. LewisDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 1997
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.