Legal Opinion

United States v. Viera

District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania

Decided July 2, 1996No. Criminal No. 1:CR-91-164-01. Civil Action No. 1:CV-96-392PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM

CALDWELL, District Judge.

I. Introduction.

The defendant, Jose Luis Viera, has filed a pro se motion under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 to vacate, set aside, or correct his sentence. Pursuant to a plea agreement, the defendant had pled guilty to a violation of 18 U.S.C. § 924(c)(1), which makes it unlawful to carry or use a firearm during and in relation to a drug trafficking offense. The motion argues that the conviction is invalid under the Supreme Court’s recent decision in Bailey v. United States, — U.S. -, 116 S.Ct. 501, 133 L.Ed.2d 472 (1995).

In opposition, the government contends that the…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Bailey v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
  2. United States v. Thomas PriceCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1996
  3. United States v. Charlene Hoyle, United States of America v. Cheryl McCullough BentonCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1994
  4. United States v. Donald Bogusz, A/K/A Bogey, United States of America v. John O'rourke, A/K/A HapCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1994
  5. United States v. Paul LevineCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1981

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. United States v. Raymond M. MidgleyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1998
  2. United States v. BunnerCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1998
  3. United States v. Raphael Podde, Gabriel ReguerCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1997
  4. State v. BelmarezNebraska Supreme Court · 1998
  5. United States v. LewisDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 1997

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API