Legal Opinion

LESTENKOF v. State

Court of Appeals of Alaska

Decided April 23, 2010No. A-10007PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

BOLGER, Judge.

This case involves the competing values protected by the constitutional guarantee that a criminal defendant must have an "impartial jury." 1 The jury venire must include a "fair cross section" of the community in which the alleged offense occurred.2 In addition, the individual jurors may not be biased by their relationships to the parties or their knowledge of the dispute.3 These values sometimes become difficult to balance when a jury trial is scheduled in a small town or village. In the current case, we conclude that the superior court properly balanced these competing…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Batson v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Duren v. MissouriSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  3. Singer v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  4. Berghuis v. SmithSupreme Court of the United States · 2010
  5. Malvo Ex Rel. Malvo v. J. C. Penney Co.Alaska Supreme Court · 1973

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. LESTENKOF v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 2010

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API