Legal Opinion

United States v. Henry

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Decided August 19, 2008No. 07-4578, 07-4587PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Reversed, vacated, and remanded by published opinion. Judge MICHAEL wrote the opinion, in which Judge SHEDD and Judge FLOYD joined.

OPINION

MICHAEL, Circuit Judge:

Edgar Henry and Kimberly Henry, who entered conditional guilty pleas to one count related to marijuana growing, appeal the district court’s denial of their motions to dismiss the indictment based on a violation of the Speedy Trial Act, 18 U.S.C. §§ 3161-3174. The Henrys contend, and we agree, that a 103-day continuance ordered by the district court did not comply with the strict requirements for granting an ends-of-justice continuance…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Zedner v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
  2. United States v. Van Scott KeithCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1994
  3. United States v. Rodriguez-AmayaCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2008

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. United States v. Robert MannCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2013
  2. United States v. Kenneth HartCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2024
  3. United States v. Quotez PairCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2023
  4. United States v. Ruby ParkerCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2013
  5. United States v. Enil Montoya VelasquezCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2022

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API