Legal Opinion

Bradford v. Board of Education

California Court of Appeal

Decided January 10, 1912No. Civ. No. 969PublishedCited by 9 opinions

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of the_ City and County of San Francisco. J. M. Seawell, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtKerrigan, J.

This is an appeal from an order and judgment, denying the petitioner a writ of mandate to compel the respondents, the board of education of the city and county of San Francisco and the members thereof, to admit petitioner as a pupil to the Girls’ High School of San Francisco, said board having theretofore suspended her for the reason that, while enrolled as a pupil in said school, she joined and became a member of a secret, oath-bound Greek letter sorority existing in said school in violation of a recent act of the legislature.

In the year 1909 there was enacted in this state the following…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Ward v. FloodCalifornia Supreme Court · 1874
  2. Wheeler v. HerbertCalifornia Supreme Court · 1907
  3. People, Ex Rel. King v. . GallagherNew York Court of Appeals · 1883
  4. State ex rel. Braley v. GaySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1894
  5. Wilson v. Board of Education of ChicagoIllinois Supreme Court · 1908

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Wright v. Board of EducationSupreme Court of Missouri · 1922
  2. Burkitt v. School District No. 1Oregon Supreme Court · 1952
  3. Flory v. SmithSupreme Court of Virginia · 1926
  4. Steele v. SextonMichigan Supreme Court · 1931
  5. Robinson v. Sacramento City Unified School DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1966

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API