Legal Opinion

Berrum v. Georgetta

Nevada Supreme Court

Decided September 5, 1939No. 3266Published

1Opinion

On Rehearing

OPINION

By the Court,

Decker, J.:

A rehearing was granted to consider the following questions:

1. Is the judgment against Anderson P. Berrum illegal because:

a. It is nowhere alleged in the complaint that he promised to pay respondent an attorney fee?

b. It is nowhere alleged in the complaint that respondent performed services for said Anderson P. Berrum?

2. Does the complaint present an action to foreclose an attorney’s lien ?

We did not determine these points made by appellants in our original opinion because they had not been assigned as errors, but as the errors alleged in this…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Peri v. New York Central & Hudson River RailroadNew York Court of Appeals · 1897
  2. Epp v. HintonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1918
  3. Newbert v. CunninghamSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1863
  4. Walsh v. HoskinsMontana Supreme Court · 1917
  5. Jacobsen v. MillerNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1924

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API