Legal Opinion

Dillon v. Weber

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided August 1, 2007No. 23985PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WILBUR, Circuit Judge.

[¶ 1.] Habeas corpus petitioner seeks relief based on ineffective assistance of trial counsel. The habeas court found no ineffective assistance. We reverse.

BACKGROUND

[¶ 2.] An overview of the factual and procedural history of this case is set forth in State v. Dillon, 2001 SD 97, 632 N.W.2d 37. Only the facts pertinent to the present habeas corpus action will be discussed here. In 1998 Farrell Dillon (Dillon) was charged with seven counts of first degree rape, two counts of third degree rape, and five counts of criminal pedophilia. 1 It was alleged that Dillon performed…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. James W. Chambers v. Bill ArmontroutCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1990
  3. State v. DillonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2001
  4. Aliberti v. SolemSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1988
  5. Roden v. SolemSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1988

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. State v. ChippsSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2016
  2. State v. ThomasSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2011
  3. McDonough v. WeberSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2015
  4. State v. DillonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2010
  5. State v. CraigSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2014

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API