Legal Opinion
Roden v. Solem
South Dakota Supreme Court
Decided November 9, 1988No. 15931PublishedCited by 38 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MILLER, Justice (on reassignment).
Francis Roden (Roden) appeals the denial of his application for habeas corpus relief grounded on a claimed ineffective assistance of counsel. We affirm.
FACTS
In January of 1985, Roden was convicted by a jury of rape in the second degree. He appealed. This court affirmed that conviction in State v. Roden, 380 N.W.2d 669 (S.D.1986) (Roden I). Roden filed a petition for habeas corpus on March 16, 1987, claiming ineffective assistance of counsel at trial. After an evidentiary hearing, the circuit court denied the petition. Roden appeals.
In support of his…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Kimmelman v. MorrisonSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- United States v. John Louis Iron Shell, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1980
- United States v. Eneas Lavern NickCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1979
- State v. DokkenSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1986
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by38 opinions
- Meinders v. WeberSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2000
- Jenner v. LeapleySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1994
- Lykken v. ClassSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1997
- State v. PerkinsSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1989
- Phyle v. LeapleySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1992
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.