Legal Opinion

WILLIAM HAIRSTON v. SADIE T. MONTGOMERY

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided November 1, 2024No. A24A1055Published

1Opinion of the Court

THIRD DIVISION DOYLE, P. J., HODGES and WATKINS, JJ. NOTICE: Motions for reconsideration must be physically received in our clerk’s office within ten days of the date of decision to be deemed timely filed. https://www.gaappeals.us/rules November 1, 2024 In the Court of Appeals of Georgia A24A0691. BRIMAR ENTERPRISES, LLC v. MONTGOMERY et al. A24A1055. HAIRSTON v. MONTGOMERY et al. DOYLE, Presiding Judge. These appeals arise from tort and contract claims brought by Sadie and Davis Montgomery against Brimar Enterprises, LLC (“Brimar”), and its sole member, William Hairston (collectively, “the…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. Zeeman v. BlackCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1980
  2. Crawford v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1989
  3. Rolleston v. HuiteCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1990
  4. Cohran v. CarlinSupreme Court of Georgia · 1982
  5. INFINITE ENERGY, INC. v. PardueCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2011

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API