Legal Opinion
Maxwell H. Gluck and Muriel Gluck v. American Protection Industries, Inc., Etc.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided June 4, 1980No. 78-2239PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
FERGUSON, Circuit Judge.
Defendants appeal the district court’s award of attorneys’ fees to plaintiffs’ attorneys. While conceding that plaintiffs’ attorneys are entitled to certain fees, defendants contend that the court abused its discretion in failing to set forth the factors considered in making its award. Defendants also contend that the trial court improperly awarded fees for time spent litigating the fee award, for costs relating to the transfer of this action from Delaware to California, and for the services of an attorney who did not maintain time records. We affirm.
I
This action arose…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Johnson v. Georgia Highway Express, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1974
- Kerr v. Screen Extras Guild, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1975
- Zurcher v. Stanford DailySupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Lindy Bros. Builders, Inc. v. American Radiator & Standard Sanitary Corp.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1976
- Prandini v. National Tea Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1978
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Loretta J. Brokeshoulder SCHWARZ, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. SECRETARY OF HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
- Roni K. Dogherra v. Safeway Stores, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1982
- Farris v. CoxDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1981
- In Re Capital Underwriters, Inc. Securities LitigationDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1981
- Bradford v. BlumDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1981
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.