Legal Opinion

Yttredahl v. Federal Farm Mortgage Corporation

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided August 2, 1960No. 7891PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BANGS, District Judge.

This is a statutory action to quiet title, involving the title and interests of the appellants, who are the owners of nonparticipating Oil and Gas Royalties, in the total amount of 9½'% of all the Oil and Gas produced and saved from the following described property in McKenzie County, North Dakota, namely:

Township 154 North, Range 95 West

Section 32; Lots 1 and 2

Section 33; Lots 1, 2, 3 and 4, SJ4 NEJ4 SE14. NWJ4

Section 34; NWJ4;

Township 153 North, Range 95 West

Section 4; Lots 2, 3 and 4, Ski NWJ4 NE|4 SWJ4

Section 5; Lot 1, SE}4 NEJ4

A summary of the facts established by…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Bilby v. WireNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1956
  2. Grandin v. GardinerNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1954
  3. Payne v. AM Fruh CompanyNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1959
  4. Broaddus v. TevisCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1943

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Kim-Go, H.K. Minerals, Inc. v. J.P. Furlong Enterprises, Inc.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1990
  2. GeoStar Corp. v. Parkway Petroleum, Inc.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1993
  3. Texaro Oil Co. v. MosserNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1980
  4. Terry v. Conway Land, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1987
  5. Farm Credit Bank of St. Paul v. MartinsonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1991

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API