Legal Opinion
In re Petitions for Rulemaking N.J.A.C. 10:82-1.2 & 10:85-4.1
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
Decided March 10, 1988PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
SHEBELL, J.A.D.
This is an appeal from the denial by the New Jersey Department of Human Services (DHS) of two petitions for rulemaking. The first was filed on behalf of all recipients of Aid to Families with Dependent Children (AFDC) in the State of New Jersey and the second on behalf of all recipients of General Assistance (GA) in the State. The petitions seek amendments to N.J.A. C. 10:82-1.2 and N.J.A.C. 10:85-4.1, respectively, to establish a “standard of need” based on actual living costs in New Jersey. We have consolidated the two appeals to this…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Rosado v. WymanSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- King v. SmithSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Texter v. Department of Human ServicesSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1982
- Pascucci v. VagottSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1976
- MOTYKA v. McCORKLESupreme Court of New Jersey · 1971
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- In Re Petitions for Rulemaking, N.J.A.C. 10:82-1.2 & 10:85-4.1Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1989
- Sojourner A. v. New Jersey Department of Human ServicesSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2003
- Matter of Petitions for RulemakingNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1988