Legal Opinion

Panniel v. Diaz

New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division

Decided February 18, 2004PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SABATINO, J.S.C.

This ease arises out of the recurring scenario in which the same insurance company happens to cover both vehicles involved in a roadway accident. As is often the case, plaintiff in this matter, a driver injured in the collision, pursued personal injury protection (PIP) medical benefits from her insurer in private arbitration, while also bringing a tort action in the Superior Court against the owner and driver of the other vehicle. After an extensive hearing at which both the plaintiff and the insurance company were represented by counsel, the PIP arbitrator concluded that…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Bruszewski v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1950
  2. Fleischman v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1950
  3. Zirger v. General Accident InsuranceSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1996
  4. Matter of Estate of DawsonSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1994
  5. Ostrowski v. AzzaraSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1988

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Bowe v. Kilmartin (In re Kilmartin)United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Kentucky · 2014
  2. Roggio v. Federal Deposit Insurance CorporationDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API