Legal Opinion

Temple v. Lindsay

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided April 1, 1935No. 33167PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ODOM, Justice.

Plaintiff acquired and was the owner of oil and gas leases on several thousand acres of land in Grant parish; all the lands covered by the leases being in what is called “wildcat territory.” He wanted a test well drilled, and to that end entered into a contract with the defendant, Lindsay, by the terms of which Lindsay agreed to drill, at his own expense, a test well to the depth of 3,009 feet, unless oil or gas was discovered at a less depth, on the S. W. corner of the S. E. % .of See. 19, T. 7 N., R. 3 W. This contract was entered into on August 8, 1933, and provided that a…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Watson v. FeibelSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1916
  2. Caldwell v. Alton Oil Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1926
  3. Pipes v. PayneSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1924
  4. Darragh v. VicknairSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1910
  5. Doiron v. Calcasieu Oil Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1931

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Brown v. Sugar Creek SyndicateSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1940
  2. Pierce v. Atlantic Refining CompanyLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1962
  3. Bailey v. MeadowsLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1961
  4. Eota Realty Co. v. Carter Oil Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1954
  5. Hibbert v. MuddSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1974

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API