Legal Opinion
State v. Metrusky
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided June 2, 1953PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtIstglts, J.
In this proceeding the state seeks reimbursement from the estate of Veronica Sarafin for the expense of supporting her son, John F. Sarafin, in state-maintained institutions for the care of the mentally ill. The state appealed from the disallowance of its claim by commissioners appointed by the Probate Court for the district of Greenwich, and the case has been reserved for the advice of this court.
The facts stipulated for the purpose of the reservation may be summarized as follows: From September 14,1932, until after the death of his mother, John F. Sarafin was continuously confined in state…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Nicholaus v. City of BridgeportSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1933
- Bull v. BullSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1876
- State Ex Rel. Lavoie v. Building CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1948
- State v. RommeSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1919
- Reilly v. StateSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1935
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Kimberly-Clark Corp. v. DubnoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1987
- State v. DoeSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1962
- McGowan v. AdministratorSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1966
- Sullivan v. MorganSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1967
- District of Columbia v. StewartDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1971
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.