Legal Opinion

Heironimus v. Duncan

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided November 2, 1895No. 934PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LIGHTFOOT, Chief Justice.

The appellee in this case has filed no brief, and we have not had the benefit of a discussion of that side of the case, or a presentation of the facts, except as they appear in appellant’s brief. In the absence of objection, we adopt appellant’s statement, as follows:

Appellee filed this suit in the District Court of Grayson County, July 28, 1892, against J. H. Heironimus, appellant, alleging that on about June 29, 1892, and prior thereto, appellee was in the quiet, peaceable and actual possession of certain premises situated in Grayson County, being a part of the…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Evitts v. RothTexas Supreme Court · 1884
  2. Whitehead v. FoleyTexas Supreme Court · 1858
  3. Cantagrel v. Von LupinTexas Supreme Court · 1883
  4. Sinclair v. StanleyTexas Supreme Court · 1888
  5. Sinclair v. StanleyTexas Supreme Court · 1885

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Ray v. DyerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1929
  2. Embry v. BEL-AIRE CORPORATIONCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1974

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API