Legal Opinion
Lindstrom v. Hanover Insurance
Supreme Court of New Jersey
Decided December 19, 1994Published
1Opinion of the Court
138 N.J. 242 (1994)
649 A.2d 1272
KURT LINDSTROM, BY HIS GUARDIAN AD LITEM, GEORGE K. LINDSTROM, AND GEORGE K. LINDSTROM, INDIVIDUALLY, PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS,
v.
THE HANOVER INSURANCE COMPANY ON BEHALF OF THE NEW JERSEY AUTOMOBILE FULL INSURANCE UNDERWRITING ASSOCIATION, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.
The Supreme Court of New Jersey.
Argued September 13, 1994.
Decided December 19, 1994.
Patricia D. Connelly argued the cause for appellant (Shebell & Schibell, attorneys; Peter Shebell, Jr., of counsel).
Mark S. Hochman argued the cause for respondent (Gertler & Hanna, attorneys).
The opinion of the Court was…
Also in this document: Dissent.
2Cases cited39 opinions
- Gemsco, Inc. v. WallingSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Guiseppi v. WallingCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1944
- SL Industries, Inc. v. American Motorists InsuranceSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1992
- Schierstead v. City of BrigantineSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1959
- Werner Industries, Inc. v. First State InsuranceSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1988
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.