Burford v. Brun
District Court, M.D. Tennessee
1Opinion
THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE NASHVILLE DIVISION DARYL K. BURFORD, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) No. 3:20-cv-00549 v. ) ) JUDGE RICHARDSON CHRIS BRUN, et al., ) ) Defendants. ) ) ) MEMORANDUM OPINION Pending before the Court is pro se Plaintiff Daryl Burford’s motion to extend the time to file a notice of appeal pursuant to Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 4(a)(5). (Doc. No. 65, “Motion”).1 Because the Court finds “good cause” for extending the notice of appeal deadline, the Motion will be GRANTED. Plaintiff’s deadline to file a notice of appeal in this Court…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Pioneer Investment Services Co. v. Brunswick Associates Ltd. PartnershipSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Bolarinwa v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2010
- Kendrix M. Easley v. University of Michigan Board of Regents Terry Sandalow, Individually and as Dean of Law SchoolCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1988
- Lorenzen v. Employees Retirement Plan of the Sperry & Hutchinson Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1990
- Nicholson v. City of WarrenCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2006
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.