Legal Opinion

Meehan v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided February 21, 1928No. 7232PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MUNGER, District Judge.

The plaintiffs in error, hereafter called defendants, were convicted of offenses against the National Prohibition Act (2¡7 USCA). The information contained four counts, each count charging a separate unlawful sale of intoxicating liquor. As the result of a trial to a jury, the defendant Meehan was convicted under eaeh count. The defendant Berg was convicted under the first three counts. The defendants moved in arrest of judgment, because no effense was stated in the information.

The contention is made that there is no explicit and direct charge that the defendants…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Burton v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1906
  2. Albrecht v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
  3. Morgan v. DevineSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
  4. Carter v. McClaughrySupreme Court of the United States · 1902
  5. Frisbie v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1895

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Dinger v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1928
  2. Stagecrafters Club, Inc. v. District of ColumbiaDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1952
  3. Stine v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1929

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API