Legal Opinion
Hannan v. Torres-Springer
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided April 17, 2020No. 1:18-cv-09878Unknown
1Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK MATTHEW HANNAN, Plaintiff, ORDER - v - 18 Civ. 9878 (PGG) (DF) AMY ROSE et al., Defendants. PAUL G. GARDEPHE, U.S.D.J.: Pro se Plaintiff Matthew Hannan brings this action under federal, state, and local law challenging his eviction from a Manhattan apartment. (Cmplt. (Dkt. No. 2)) Defendants Amy Rose, Kevin Rodrigues, and Yamile Zarzuela have moved to dismiss. Magistrate Judge Debra Freeman submitted a Report and Recommendation (“R&R”) recommending that this Court grant in part and deny in part the motion. (R&R (Dkt. No. 76) at 38)1…
2Cases cited38 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Ben Gary Triestman v. Federal Bureau of Prisons, United States of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2006
- District of Columbia Court of Appeals v. FeldmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Rooker v. Fidelity Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1924
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.