Legal Opinion
Fosbinder v. County of San Diego
District Court, S.D. California
Decided October 30, 2024No. 3:24-cv-00733Unknown
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 RODGER FOSBINDER, Case No.: 24-cv-733-RSH-SBC 12 Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND 13 v. DENYING IN PART DEFENDANT COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO’S 14 COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO, et al., MOTION TO DISMISS 15 Defendants. [ECF No. 6] 16 17 18 19 Before the Court is a motion to dismiss filed by defendant County of San Diego 20 (“County”). ECF No. 6. Pursuant to Local Civil Rule 7.1(d)(1) the Court finds the motion 21 presented appropriate for resolution without oral argument. For the reasons below, the 22 Court grants in part…
2Cases cited38 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- DeShaney v. Winnebago County Department of Social ServicesSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Moss v. U.S. Secret ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.