Rio Grande Nat. Life Ins. Co. v. Faulkner
Court of Appeals of Texas
1Opinion
On Rehearing.
YOUNG and CRAMER, Justices.
Reference in original opinion to the‘employment contract of Mrs. Shortnacy (excluded by the trial court) was unnecessary to the points under discussion, the instrument being merely corroborative of the record proper.
It appears -without dispute that this lady was no more than a solicitating agent of the-company, Art. 5063, Vernon’s Ann.Civ.St.,. providing in part that “such agent shall not have the power to waive, change or alter any of the terms or conditions of the application or policy.” Likewise the policy on its face recites that “This policy shall…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Great American Casualty Co. v. EichelbergerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1931
- Eaton v. N.Y. Life Ins. Co. of N.Y.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1933
- Southland Life Insurance Co. v. StatlerTexas Supreme Court · 1942
- Donaldson v. Natl. Life & Accident Ins. Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1932
- Willis v. Texas Prudential Ins. Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1937
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.