Legal Opinion

Davis v. Mather

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided October 20, 1923No. 15411PublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Stone

Appellees filed a bill for partition in the circuit court of Madison county praying partition of certain land alleged to have been devised to them by George H. Davis. Appellants defended on the ground that Davis did not own such land, for the reason that the renunciation of the will of Annie S. Davis, by which renunciation he received the land in question, was not valid. The sole question presented on this record is whether or not a renunciation of a bequest or devise may be made at the direction of the probate court by the next friend of a surviving insane husband, under section 12 of the…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Van Steenwyck v. WashburnWisconsin Supreme Court · 1884
  2. Carper v. CrowlIllinois Supreme Court · 1894
  3. Sebree v. SebreeIllinois Supreme Court · 1920
  4. Cowdrey v. HitchcockIllinois Supreme Court · 1882
  5. Hannah v. MeinshausenIllinois Supreme Court · 1921

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. Kerner v. PetersonIllinois Supreme Court · 1937
  2. Mead v. PhillipsCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1943
  3. First Natl. Bk. of St. Petersburg v. MacDonaldSupreme Court of Florida · 1930
  4. In Re Estate of DonovanIllinois Supreme Court · 1951
  5. Colvin v. HutchisonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1936

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API