Sherry v. Foresman

The appellants sued the appellees in an action of debt on a replevin-bond.

The declaration states that Foresman made affidavit, that he *61and another of the defendants, Earl, were the owners of the pork, hams, and lard, of a certain number of hogs, and that the same were unlawfully detained from them by the plaintiffs. The declaration also states that, on this affidavit, a writ of replevin was issued commanding the sheriff to take said property, and if Foresman and Earl should give security to prosecute, &o., then to replevy7 and deliver the property to them; that the sheriff took possession of…