Legal Opinion

Scott v. Rogers

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided January 24, 1895PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Memorandum.—Debt. In the Circuit Court of Mercer County; the Hon. John J. Glenn, Judge, presiding. Declaration on a replevin bond; trial by jury; verdict and judgment for plaintiff; error by defendant. Heard in this court at the December term, 1894,

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Harker

This suit was commenced against the plaintiffs in error upon a replevin bond, executed to Rogers, as constable, in a certain replevin suit for a heifer, by Robert Scott against Abraham Beard and Nathan Beard. There was a recovery against the plaintiffs in error.

There is no bill of exceptions, and all the questions for our •consideration arise upon the holdings of the court below in settling the pleadings.

The declaration recites the execution and delivery of the bond, the replevin of the property, a trial of the right of it, and a finding against Scott, an order of retorno, and a failure to…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Suppiger v. GruazIllinois Supreme Court · 1891
  2. Harts v. WendellAppellate Court of Illinois · 1887
  3. Dalby v. CampbellAppellate Court of Illinois · 1888
  4. Siegel v. HanchettAppellate Court of Illinois · 1889

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Gualdoni v. RobinsonAppellate Court of Illinois · 1923
  2. H. Cohen & Co. v. John I. Adams & Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1896

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API