Legal Opinion
Cadlo v. Metalclad Insulation Corp.
California Court of Appeal
Decided June 11, 2007No. A111353, A112002PublishedCited by 2 opinions
[CERTIFIED FOR PARTIAL PUBLICATION*]
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
SIMONS, J.
Two days after a jury verdict in his favor in his asbestos-related personal injury action against defendants Metalclad Insulation Corporation (Metalclad) and John Crane Inc. (Crane), Anthony Cadlo (Cadlo) died. Judgment was entered on April 4, 2005, more than one week after his death, on behalf of his widow Maxlyn Cadlo (Maxlyn Cadlo), individually and as successor in interest to her husband. Subsequently, the trial court vacated that judgment and, nunc pro tunc, entered a retroactive judgment to March 23, 2005, the day after the verdict and one day before Cadlo died. In that…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Sullivan v. Delta Air Lines, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1997
- Walker v. Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation AuthorityCalifornia Supreme Court · 2005
- Shapiro v. Equitable Life Assurance SocietyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1946
- Craven v. CroutCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1985
- Jones v. John Crane, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2005
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Garcia v. DURO DYNE CORPORATIONCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2007
- Cadlo v. METALCLAD INSULATION CORP.California Court of Appeal · 2009