Legal Opinion

Wilmington Trust Co v. Worth

Court of Chancery of Delaware

Decided June 19, 1933PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The Chancellor:

The first question for consideration is • whether the trustees are vested with discretionary power with respect to the investing and re-investing of the trust funds. Specifically, the trustees desire to be instructed upon whether they are confined in the matter of investments to so-called “legáis,” or may they in their discretion step outside of the “legáis” and invest in such securities as in the exercise of their discretion they deem to be desirable for the investment of the trust principal.

Upon the assumption that the answer to this question may be thought by the court to…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Taylor's EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1923
  2. Detre's EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1922
  3. Barker's EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1894
  4. Duncklee v. ButlerNew York Supreme Court · 1899
  5. Lockwood v. StradleyCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1825

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. In re the Trust Estate of CookCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1934
  2. Equitable Trust Co. v. SnaderCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1934
  3. Union National Bank v. WilsonCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1942
  4. duPont v. Delaware Trust Co.Court of Chancery of Delaware · 1973
  5. Carwithen's EstatePennsylvania Orphans' Court, Philadelphia County · 1937

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API