Legal Opinion

Adcock v. Life Assur. Co. of Carolina

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided October 6, 1976No. 7616DC354PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BROCK, Chief Judge.

Defendant first contends that the trial court erred in not admitting the records of deceased’s hospitalization six months prior to the shooting. Defendant maintains the admission of this evidence would tend to establish in the deceased a despondent and suicidal state of mind.

“Whether the existence of a particular state of affairs at one time is admissible as evidence of the same state of affairs at another time, depends altogether upon the nature of the subject matter, the length of time intervening, and the extent of the showing, if any, on the question of whether or not…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Privette v. PrivetteCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1976
  2. Starkey Paint Co. v. Springfield Life InsuranceCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1975

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Drain v. United Services Life Insurance Co.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1987
  2. Drain v. United Services Life Insurance Co.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1987
  3. Gayhart v. Southern Farm Bureau Life Insurance CompanyDistrict Court, E.D. North Carolina · 2025
  4. Maddox v. Colonial Life & Accident InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1981
  5. Maddox v. Colonial Life & Accident InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1981

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API