Legal Opinion

Van Dyke v. Van Dyke

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided November 19, 1981No. B2753PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SAM ROBERTSON, Justice.

This appeal arises from the court’s division of property in a divorce proceeding. Appellant, plaintiff in the trial court, has filed a motion to dismiss the appeal, contending that the judgment entered by the trial court is interlocutory and, therefore, not appealable. Originally, appellant complained that the values placed on certain property and the resulting property division were manifestly unjust and inequitable and amounted to an abuse of the trial court’s discretion. She further claimed prejudice in presenting her appeal caused by the trial court’s late filing of…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Hedtke v. HedtkeTexas Supreme Court · 1923
  2. Cockerham v. CockerhamTexas Supreme Court · 1975
  3. Cooper v. CooperCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1974
  4. Hayes v. NormanCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1964
  5. Waggener v. WaggenerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1970

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Van Dyke v. Boswell, O'Toole, Davis & PickeringTexas Supreme Court · 1985
  2. Johnson v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)1988
  3. Lettieri v. LettieriCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1983
  4. C.S.R., Inc. v. Mobile Crane Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District1984
  5. Welch v. WelchCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1985

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API